SAT Scores for Admission to Top Engineering Schools

Democracy in America Today - 1747 Words

Democracy in America Today Pos/110 October 16, 2011 Final Project: Democracy in America Since the beginning of American Democracy it has been morphed from the founder’s format. With all its changes, it still functions as a well-constructed form of democracy that supports our nation. American democracy has both strengths and weaknesses. Government spending or over-spending is a core issue facing our nation in these economically troubled times. There are many points to be addressed regarding American government today. Adjustments within American democracy have caused us to land in our current situation of economic uncertainty. Some of these developments have actually had a negative impact on democracy and the people†¦show more content†¦The Constitution is at risk of being overrun in our current political climate. The gap between the rich and poor in American society had been narrowed during the last 50 years of the last century. It has been widened during the past decade and threatens our social stability. Many people like to say that America is a place of equality and opportunity. In my opinion, it is still a place of disparity and inequality. The most basic element of our democratic process that should be its greatest strength has become our greatest weakness. This is a great issue among those in our society who cannot find access to services or opportunity and is swept under the rug by those members of our society who have been able to find a way to succeed inside the system. A new type of inequality has crept over us in the recent past. It is the way in which government shows bias to one group of citizens over another. These economic disparities strengthen the cause of those who have against those who do not have. They relate specifically to the unequal distribution of resources, education and income potential. Those members of our society who have been minimized have much less political voice and therefore can expect to continue to receive less in the way of equal treatment and equal access to services and education. Reviewing the Constitution and American Democracy based on what I have learned in this course, I find that the Bill ofShow MoreRelatedOur Founding Fathers Affect on the Past, Present, and Future Essay1395 Words   |  6 Pagesdirect democracy. They believed that the â€Å"follies† of direct democracy far outweighed any virtues it might possess (Politics in American pg. 76). According to an essay by Rose Wilder Lane (Lane, 1943), â€Å"George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, James Madison, and James Monroe feared democracy.† The founders believed that the Constitution left all other governmental powers to the states (Politics in American 2009 pg. 133). Our Founding Fathers never intended for America to becomeRead MoreCritical Analysis of Alex de Tocquevilles Democracy in America1366 Words   |  6 PagesAnalysis of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America Alexis de Tocqueville’s visit to the United States in 1831 prompted his work Democracy in America. This was supposed to be a chance for him to take a look at the American prison system. However, it was obvious from his writing that he looked at every aspect of American culture. In Democracy in America, he takes a look at how democracy works and the pitfalls that could bring about the downfall of democracy. Throughout his travels he noticedRead More Americas Democracy Essay1091 Words   |  5 PagesAmericas Democracy The United States of America is a republic, or representative democracy. Democracy, a word that comes to us from Greek, literally means the people rule (Romance, July 8). This broad definition leaves unanswered a few important details such as who are the people, how shall they rule, and what should they rule on (July 8). Defining the answers to those questions means defining a model for a democratic system. William E. Hudson defines four such models in his book American DemocracyRead MoreThe Concept Of American Democracy1699 Words   |  7 Pages Democracy is perhaps the most elusive concept of all times. But if there has to be something more elusive, it will surely be the concept of American democracy. In 1858, Abraham Lincoln is known to have written:  ¨As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master †¦ This expresses my idea of democracy. Whoever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is no democracy. ¨ The initial understanding of American democracy takes the form of an antithesis of English colonialism and slaveryRead MoreOur Founding Fathers Effect on the Past, Present, and Future Essay1133 Words   |  5 Pagesdirect democracy. They believed that the â€Å"follies† of direct democracy far outweighed any virtues it might possess (Politics in American pg. 76). According to an essay by Rose Wilder Lane (Lane, 1943), â€Å"George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, James Madison, and James Monroe feared democracy.† The founders believed that the Constitution left all other governmental powers to the states (Politics in American 2009 pg. 133). Our Founding Fathers never intended for America to becomeRead MoreEssay on Is Democracy Sustainable in Latin America?1274 Words   |  6 PagesIs Democracy Sustainable in Latin America? In order to determine if democracy is sustainable in Latin America, it is important to understand or at least have an idea of what democracy is. There are several types of democracy and each is different. According to the English dictionary, democracy is â€Å" a government by the people; especially: rule of the majority by a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by themRead MoreThe American Empire: Exceptionalist Political, Economic, and Public Policies1446 Words   |  6 PagesAmerica is like the 800-pound gorilla in every room in the world. When it gets a cold, the world wheezes, when it has a tingle, the world scratches. When it neglects to act, it regularly sends a swell around the globe. For some, it is a model for different societies to imitate. This thought of American exceptionalism really has numerous roots and numerous varieties. One is the old Puritan idea, in light of a John Winthrop sermon, that America is a city upon a hill. T his notion of America as GodsRead MorePericles, The Grandfather Of Freedom Essay1642 Words   |  7 Pagesin his own people, but he also wanted Athens to be recognized as a perfect example for democracy. Though he did perish and Athens had fallen, it stuck in history just as he wanted it to be, a perfect example. Proof of this lies in the fact that throughout history, American presidents and revolutionists have been using this speech as their guidelines to the perfect America. It’s a lesson that the people of today need to realize, a way of understanding that people need to open up to. WithRead MoreThe Declaration Of Independence And The Constitution1668 Words   |  7 Pagesachievements of humanity as a whole has been the development of democracy. This idea sprouted with the growth of history’s most successful and innovative civilizations; the Greeks and the Romans. Their enormous populations called for a fair and just way of governing. Why not allow control to stem from the populations own members? This logical way of thought is still evident in the world today, especially in the democracy of the United States of America. Upon examination of America’s most valuable texts, theRead MoreCorruption Of Democracy : America s Democracy1214 Words   |  5 PagesToday, our nation s democracy is unarguably only alive on a small scale. Much of America s population, does not uphold a civic role that consistently supplements a successful democracy. Corruption of democracy stems directly from Americans not being able to actively take responsibility for thei r own society or their own futures. As a result of individuals lacking responsibility in various ways, flaws in our society continue to define everything we are as part of America. Everyone in the country

Dracula Paper free essay sample

The conflict of science versus superstition is drawn out throughout the whole novel. We know that some of our main characters, Jon, Van Helsing and Dracula all depict one of the two, or both. Stoker does not make a point that religion is more important than science, and vice versa. I personally believe that he tries to portray that both science and religion are important to the novel. Through the series of events that partake within the duration of the novel there are many things that one can explain but not the other. But, both science and religion cannot explain everything just themselves. Three of the main characters all portray science, superstition or a little bit of both, science and superstition, representing that both cannot exist without the other. Jon Harker, our main character represents one hundred percent science, we are really shown this in the first four chapters in the novel. We will write a custom essay sample on Dracula Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Jon who knows nothing but science tries to take what he knows about science and tries to apply it to Dracula who represents the opposite of Jon, one hundred percent superstition or religion. There are so many things that Harker tries while he stays at Dracula’s castle. Initially he is uneasy about staying with in the castle, but Draculas warm welcome calms Harker momentarily. As he settles in he observes Dracula’s physical traits, pointed ears, extremely pale skin and exceptionally sharp teeth, Harker becomes uneasy again. He starts to pick up on small things such as why there are no mirrors in the castle, and why he doesn’t show up during the day. He attempts to explain this with science and he struggles to do so. As Jonathan is trying to find a way to escape the castle he has a strange meeting with three vampire girls, which is unusual for him. I was afraid to raise my eyelids, but looked out and saw perfectly under the lashes. The fair girl went on her knees, and bent over me, fairly gloating. There was a deliberate voluptuousness which was both thrilling and repulsive, and as she arched her neck she actually licked her lips like an animal, till I could see in the moonlight the moisture shining on the scarlet lips and on the red tongue as it lapped the white sharp teeth. Lower and lower went her head as the lips went below the range of my mouth and chin and seemed to fasten on my throat. I could feel the soft,  shivering touch of the lips on the supersensitive skin of my throat, and the hard dents of two sharp teeth, just touching and pausing there. I closed my eyes in a languorous ecstacy and waited waited with beating heart. (Stoker, 57) Jon Harker is not sure what is happening and who these girls are and he doesn’t learn to understand this until Dracula shows up and tells them to back of because Jon is his. I think this is when it really settles in for Jon that science cannot explain why Dracula crawls up the sides of the walls of the castle or has razor sharp teeth. You are clever man, friend John; you reason well, and your wit is bold; but you are too prejudiced. You do not let your eyes see nor your ears hear, and that which is outside your daily life is not of account to you. Ah, it is the fault of our science that it wants to explain all; and if it explain not, then it says there is nothing to explain. Van Helsing laments the narrow and prejudiced vision of Seward, the rational man of science who understands nothing about the ultimate cause of Lucys death and the Un-dead Lucys preying upon children. If Seward has no data, he is unable to draw any conclusion and therefore unable to act. He does not believe in vampires because there is no proof, so he is vulnerable to the Counts evil. Van Helsing, in contrast, knows this territory because he has kept an open mind and has drawn upon a broad base of knowledge, from modern science to ancient lore. A brave mans blood is the best thing on this earth when a woman is in trouble.' (Chapter 12) Van Helsing asks Quincey Morris to donate his blood to save Lucys life. Throughout the novel, there is a morally upstanding quality to the blood that the men donate to Lucy. In Chapter 10, Van Helsing comments that Holmwood is so young and strong and of blood so pure that we need not defibrinate it. The pure and wholesome blood of these fine young men stands in contrast to the tainted, death-dealing blood of the Count, who infects his victims with the curse of vampirism.

The Skill Of Running A State Essay free essay sample

, Research Paper The Skill of Runing a State Among the most widely read of the Renaissance minds was Niccolo Machiavelli. Born in Florence, Italy in 1469, he became a politician who retired from public service and devoted the proceeding old ages to composing about history, political doctrine, and even dramas. His political doctrine # 8217 ; s concentrated on the accomplishments required for successfully running a province. Machiavelli focused on the manner things are, instead than the manner things ought to be. In 1513, Machiavelli wrote his best known work, # 8220 ; The Prince # 8221 ; . The implicit in subject provinces that a successful prince must show virtuousnesss, such as strength and accomplishment, in favourable and inauspicious state of affairss. Therefore, Machiavelli proposes that a swayer must obtain a good repute by fall backing to any agencies necessary given the fortunes. Although, it is desirable to be both loved and feared by one # 8217 ; s topics, Machiavelli declares it is far safer for the swayer to be feared. We will write a custom essay sample on The Skill Of Running A State Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Therefore, in # 8220 ; The Prince # 8221 ; , Machiavelli argues the significance of a prince to be feared and avoid being hated by his topics, which can be achieved through fraudulence and corruptness, in order to keep the stableness of the province. # 8220 ; The Prince # 8221 ; is one of the first scrutinies of political relations and scientific discipline from a strictly scientific and rational position. Machiavelli theorizes that the province is merely created if the people cooperate and work to keep it. The province is besides one of adult male s greatest enterprises, and the province takes precedency over everything else. The province should be one s primary focal point, and keeping the sovereignty of the province is one s most critical concern. The province is founded on the power of its military. Therefore, a strong armed forces is critical to keeping the province. Machiavelli believes that work forces respect power, but they will take advantage of kindness. He believes that when given the chance, one must destruct wholly, because if one does non, he will surely be destroyed. The prince should take the military, and he has to be intelligent. An effectual politician can do speedy and intelligent picks about the jobs that invariably arise before him. He must besides hold virtuousness, which means he is strong, confident, gifted, every bit good as smart. A prince can non be unsure, because uncertainness is a mark of failing. Fortune controls half of human s actions, and Man will command the other half. Virtue is the best defence for luck, and virtuousness must be used in order to maintain luck in cheque. The prince must take advantage of state of affairss based entirely on if it is best for the province. He should take his determinations based on modern-day and historical illustrations. A prince can non see whether his Acts of the Apostless are moral or immoral, and he alternatively must move in an indifferent mode for the province. Furthermore, it does non count how the province achieves its ends, every bit long as these ends are achieved Machiavelli farther concludes that it is hard to be loved and feared at the same time. Harmonizing to Machiavelli, the reply is that it would be desirable to be both, but since that is hard, it is much safer to be feared than loved. The job with being loved is that it will non needfully maintain you from acquiring trampled. Indeed, if people are afraid of their prince, so they will be loyal. If the people fear their swayer, than they would non even contemplate about cabaling against him. Therefore, # 8220 ; fright is sustained by a apprehension of penalty that neer forsakes you # 8221 ; . Men will waver to pique a swayer that has made himself feared. It is merely a natural portion of human nature to non volitionally contend person that they are afraid of. Being feared and non despised is a dependable mechanism that a prince should use. Equally long as the prince abstains from impounding his citizen # 8217 ; s belongings and adult females, he can outdo avoid being overthrown. Furth ermore, if it is deemed necessary to put to death person, it should follow through merely if there is an obvious and merely cause. For all the people will of all time inquire of their swayer is for him to keep their best involvements in all important affairs. Machiavelli besides explains that the crowned head must take whatever action is necessary to keep order in society. In clip this will ensue in the most compassionate pick excessively. Machiavelli explains that, Cesare Borgia, by utilizing inhuman treatment was able to accomplish order and obeisance in Romangna. This contrast with the inactivity of the Florentines, who allowed internal struggle to develop in Pistoia, resulted in desolation of the metropolis. Therefore, a figure of extremely seeable executings can be really effectual in commanding the people and forestalling a major eruption of force and slaying. Machiavelli besides cites the enormous military successes of Hannibal. Even though Hannibal led an ground forces of different races over foreign dirt, he neer had any discord because of his repute of extreme inhuman treatment. Machiavelli negotiations systematically about the Roman Empire and its swayers. Particularly, he stresses the importance of holding a strong ground forces and popular support by the ground forces and the people. The Roman emperors proved to us many times that a swayer who is perceived to be weak is the most vulnerable to assail. Alexander Severus was controlled by his female parent and considered feminine by his military personnels. He was a good swayer, but it was this visual aspect of failing that led his military personnels to kill him. Antonius Caracalla is another illustration of an erroneous swayer. He was a really strong military leader who was a great combatant. Unfortunately, he became an incredib ly cruel and rough swayer over clip, and therefore, he was killed by a centurion. Machiavelli besides includes the state of Italy into much of his Hagiographas. He hopes to repossess the land, which has been taken off from them. He feels that Italian princes have lost their provinces because they have non had armed people. Machiavelli tells us that an â€Å"armed population is a stable population† . However, when a prince is with his ground forcess and has a huge figure of soldiers functioning his authorities, # 8220 ; so it is above all necessary non to care about a name for inhuman treatment # 8221 ; . This is due to the fact that ground forcess are neer kept united, nor are they put together unless their leader is rough. Although non all topics can be armed, those who receive the particular intervention and are armed become obligated to the prince and will therefore be faithful. But when a prince disarms them, they may acquire offended and experience as if they are distrusted, which would bring forth feelings of hatred. The best possible safety cyberspace for a prince is to maintain his topics happy, armed and faithful. Not to be disliked by your people is the best possible fortress that a prince hopes to accomplish. In add-on, Machiavelli believes that a wise swayer should look to hold the virtuousness of clemency but in world, pattern inhuman treatment. Yet the grades of inhuman treatment may change. For case, a prince may take to be terrible in the beginning of his opinion and so be moderate after some clip. Machiavelli suggests that a prince must ever exhibit five virtuousnesss in peculiar: clemency, honestness, humanity, uprightness, and devoutness. It is critical that all of the swayers seem devout because people will blindly see the side of the swayer that he undertakings and wants them to see. For # 8220 ; work forces in general justice more by their eyes than custodies, because visual perception is given to everyone, touching to few # 8221 ; . Machiavelli goes on to state that hatred is acquired through the Acts of the Apostless of good and bad workss. Hence it is necessary for a prince, if he wants to keep himself, to larn to be able non to be good, and to utilize this and non utilize it harmonizing to necessity. Covering with the spiritual facets of the above written virtuousnesss, Machiavelli explains that the great princes of the past complete great things without taking religion into history. Yet, a prince has to be cunning and appear to hold religion. Furthermore, Machiavelli # 8217 ; s analogy of the fox and the king of beasts complies with the impression that a prince must cognize when to lead on his people. The fox represents the type of animate being that is cunning and the king of beasts signifies a feared animate being. Therefore, it is of import for a prince to cognize when to convey out these qualities and how to equilibrate their effects. He believes that people are already eager and ready to be deceived, and that # 8220 ; work forces are so simple and so obedient to show necessities that he who deceives will ever happen person who will allow themselves be deceived # 8221 ; . From this it appears that people will non consciously seek the truth in order to avoid confusion and struggle. Obviously, a swayer that encompasses the mere kernel of all of these virtuousnesss, when faced with a fluctuation of luck, is non bided by those qualities. He will be able to fall back to evil steps when forced by necessity. Indeed, to ho ld that signifier of purchase is of import for the success of the province. Furthermore, Machiavelli strongly argues that the generousness of a prince will harm him in the long tally. If a prince is unfeignedly generous, he has to be broad, which entails the qualities of luxury and extravagancy. As a consequence, the swayer will # 8220 ; devour all his resources in such workss # 8221 ; . In order to go on his liberalness he will be forced to be strict with revenue enhancements. Due to this facet the prince will be hated by his topics, and since he will be poverty- stricken, he will therefore be held with small respect. There is nil that is more self-consuming as generousness ; the more it is practiced, the less it will be able to go on to be practiced. The swayer will be despised and hapless that will do him genuinely hated. Above all, a swayer must guard against being hated. So, it is better to cultivate a repute for beastliness. If the people consider their swayer to be mean, they will still fear him because of that quality, but non detest him. Another ruin from a generous prince comes from the fact that work forces are pretentious, frivolous, # 8220 ; thankless, volatile, Pretenders and hypocrites, evaders of danger, tidal bore for addition # 8221 ; . A prince that has founded himself based on friendly relationships with other work forces is ruined. For friendly relationships can be traded for other promises, when acquired by money and turn out to be really undependable when they are needed. Men will non be loath to pique a swayer that is generous and efforts to do him loved. Regardless, a wise swayer should trust on what is under his control and capablenesss. Machiavelli has wondrous depicted the accomplishments a successful swayer must larn to continue solidness in his province. Even if a prince has to utilize immoral steps to guarantee the province # 8217 ; s good being, Machiavelli finds this justifiable in the kingdom of political relations. For this is a cardinal component that Machiavelli portrays in # 8220 ; The Prince # 8221 ; . Cipher wants to assist a weak individual without profiting from his or her services, that is human nature # 8217 ; s manner of thought. Therefore, Machiavelli stresses that it is imperative that a swayer be feared and derive this repute through his ain actions. However, Machiavelli states his points on why a prince should avoid being hated if he plans to go on to govern even if he has to be fallacious and corrupt.